'

[Irl-dean] Centre for Excellence

Hugh O'Neill honeill at crc.ie
Thu Nov 10 09:54:22 GMT 2005


Hi Mark,

You are correct, Scientific Generics want to have gathered their feedback by 2nd of December.
As Josh suggested, it would be good to discuss this at the next Irl-Dean meeting.
The next seminar is on the 23rd of November, so it would be a good time to finalise our thoughts on the issue. I'll set aside time in the afternoon so we can talk about it. 

I think the best approach is that anyone who has ideas about the centre for excellence, post them to the Irl-Dean mailing list. At the seminar, we can go through these, and go into more detail on what we are suggesting. 

All the best,
Hugh

-----Original Message-----
From: irl-dean-admin at list.eeng.dcu.ie
[mailto:irl-dean-admin at list.eeng.dcu.ie]On Behalf Of Mark Magennis
Sent: 10 November 2005 09:28
To: irl-dean at list.eeng.dcu.ie
Subject: RE: [Irl-dean] Centre for Excellence
Importance: Low


What is the timescale for Scientific Generics to gather this input?
According to the info I have, the target date for completion of their
study is Friday 2 December.

Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: irl-dean-admin at list.eeng.dcu.ie 
> [mailto:irl-dean-admin at list.eeng.dcu.ie] On Behalf Of Joshue O Connor
> Sent: 09 November 2005 17:03
> To: irl-dean at list.eeng.dcu.ie
> Subject: Re: [Irl-dean] Centre for Excellence
> 
> 
> I feel that the Centre could have a very "real" contribution 
> to make but 
> I am concerned that it doesn't duplicate work already being done. As 
> Mark already suggested, through looking for a "gap" and attempting to 
> fill it, we can thereby improve and compliment existing services.
> 
> I attended a meeting in the NDA with Scientific Generics and 
> they asked 
> what "we" would like "them" to do for "us".  I found this 
> rather broad 
> question difficult to answer without prior time for reflection and 
> discussion, but one suggestion I made was research into areas 
> that "we" 
> (the collective), are not in a position to do. One example would be a 
> study of the high degree of Assistive Technology device 
> abandonment, why 
> does it happen? what can be done to reduce it etc? Many of us 
> are not in 
> a position to look at this area so maybe they could undertake 
> this and 
> other similar research, which would hopefully have a practical 
> application and help all of us, in the long run, provide a 
> better service.
> 
> The development of this centre is certainly food for thought, as it's 
> not every day we are given carte-blanche, so we do need to 
> discuss it in 
> depth and come up with come coherent suggestions.
> 
> I like your idea Henry about the development of a "virtual library" 
> where developers could access accessible code for web/software 
> applications. Also
> 
> > research on the accessibility
> >implications of new technologies before they are introduced. 
> Currently there
> >is no commercial incentive to this kind of thing.
> >
> your suggestion is similar to my previous one. Research into 
> these, and 
> other related areas, would be valuable and many of us are not in a 
> position to undertake it. The better the ground work that we 
> do at this 
> point in order to point them in the right direction, the greater 
> possibility for success. So, in many ways this is a great opportunity 
> and we should put it on the agenda for the next Irl-Dean 
> meeting. What 
> do you think Hugh?
> 
> Josh
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Henry Poskitt wrote:
> 
> >It would be good to give some practical suggestions OK.
> >
> >How about developing generic accessible templates for common 
> interactive
> >components used on public sector sites would be a quick way 
> of making a real
> >difference. I'm thinking searches and list returns, contact forms,
> >publications lists or an accessibility page template. They 
> would be tested
> >and checked by people like CFIT and then made freely 
> available online. It
> >would also allow smaller agencies to get access to top notch code.
> >
> >The other thing that would be good is research on the accessibility
> >implications of new technologies before they are introduced. 
> Currently there
> >is no commercial incentive to this kind of thing.
> >
> >Henry
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Irl-dean mailing list
> >Irl-dean at list.eeng.dcu.ie
> >http://list.eeng.dcu.ie/mailman/listinfo/irl-dean
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Irl-dean mailing list
> Irl-dean at list.eeng.dcu.ie
> http://list.eeng.dcu.ie/mailman/listinfo/irl-dean
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Irl-dean mailing list
Irl-dean at list.eeng.dcu.ie
http://list.eeng.dcu.ie/mailman/listinfo/irl-dean

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Information in this e-mail (including attachment) is confidential. It is intended for receipt and consideration only by the intended recipient. If you are not an addressee or intended recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution, disclosure, publication or copying of information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited. opinions expressed  in this email may be personal to the author and are not necessarily the opinions of the Central Remedial Clinic. If this email has been received in error we would be grateful if you could immediately notify us by email at helpdesk at crc.ie and thereafter delete this email from your system.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




More information about the CEUD-ICT mailing list