[Irl-dean] Opinions: HTML Transitional and WCAG Double-A

[Barry McMullin]

On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Joshue O Connor wrote:

> > I think XHTML vs. HTML should be treated as a completely separate
> > question from strict versus transitional.
>
> Looking forward to it. We can also look at http accept headers and MIME
> types (Serving XHTML as "application/xhtml+xml" versus "text/html").

Yes - it's a very debated issue. I am personally persuaded by Ian
Hixie's analysis:

<http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml>

but your mileage may vary.  But, in any case, since I am not
encouraging anybody to serve XHTML to the client side at all,
it's not my problem <wink>!

Best - Barry.