'

[Irl-dean] Opinions: HTML Transitional and WCAG Double-A

Joshue O Connor joshue.oconnor at ncbi.ie
Thu Jan 11 11:49:05 GMT 2007


Just as an aside, Jukka Korpela posted this to the W3C HTML list as a
response to a "Where can I find out about the latest standards and what
should I use?" (an honest and straightforward question). I 'm sure some
of you have seen it but I thought it apt in light of this thread. It
made me chuckle :)

Josh

<quote>

On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, GOODRICH, JOHN (SBC-OPS) wrote:

> I am new to developing Web pages with HTML, and I'm a bit confused of
> where to look for the most current standards.

The only _standard_ in the strict sense of the word is ISO HTML, but
very few people take it seriously.

> It would be helpful if
> the W3C home page simply said somewhere prominently, "The latest
> standard for HTML specifications" or something like that.

The page http://www.w3.org/TR/ lists W3C specifications, and the newest
of HTML specs is XHTML Print. So what? It says that it "is designed to
be appropriate for printing from mobile devices to low-cost printers".
(I'm biting my tongue to avoid making ironic remarks, since irony has
become impossible here.)

Going backwards in time, you next find XHTML 1.1. So what? It's an
exercise in futility.

The question is: should you follow the newest W3C recommendation? Why?

> Can someone
> just tell me if it is XHTML 1.1, 1.0, XFORMS, XHTML-Print, HTML 4.01, or
> what?

The expert consensus, possibly excluding some people in the W3C HTML
group, is that you should use HTML 4.01 as the format of your web pages.
In private applications, and as internal format of data that will be
converted to web pages, you can use whatever format you find suitable.

The main reason is that Internet Explorer has no understanding of XHTML
when served as XHTML. Besides, you gain nothing by using real XHTML on
the web, except possibly the phenomenon that _any_ violation of general
XML rules ("well-formedness rules") should make a browser report the
error to the user and refrain from displaying any of the content of the
page.

-- 
Jukka "Yucca" Korpela, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

</quote>



********************************************************************

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments 
is confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of 
the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify 
the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to 
delete it and any attachments from your system.

NCBI endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated 
by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.  However, 
it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are 
transmitted.  We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent the views of NCBI


********************************************************************







More information about the CEUD-ICT mailing list