'
[Irl-dean] Color contrast and WCAG 2.2 priority?
Paul Walsh, Segala
paul at segala.com
Wed Jan 17 15:22:28 GMT 2007
Look at you! Thanks Gez.
It doesn't help the Web 2.0 folk though; most of the associated colours
fail. I think we're going to see a lot of alternatives coming up.
Cheers,
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: irl-dean-admin at list.eeng.dcu.ie
[mailto:irl-dean-admin at list.eeng.dcu.ie] On Behalf Of Gez Lemon
Sent: 17 January 2007 15:11
To: irl-dean at list.eeng.dcu.ie
Subject: Re: [Irl-dean] Color contrast and WCAG 2.2 priority?
Hi Paul,
On 17/01/07, Paul Walsh, Segala <paul at segala.com> wrote:
> *Personally* I really dislike the threshold for these particular points,
> they are way too strict for my liking. Moreover, they are more strict than
> HP's guidelines (no time to dig out references sorry!), which has a lot of
> experience in this area.
The algorithm you're referring to was just a suggested algorithm by
AERT, and never became a recommendation. The algorithm was based on
the YIQ colour space previously used by the NTSC television standard,
and wasn't appropriate for the web. I think the new luminosity
contrast ratio algorithm included in the draft of WCAG 2.0 is much
better in this regard, as it's derived from the Standard Color Space
for the Internet [1], which HP were involved with.
[1] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/Color/sRGB
Best regards,
Gez
--
_____________________________
Supplement your vitamins
http://juicystudio.com
_______________________________________________
Irl-dean mailing list
Irl-dean at list.eeng.dcu.ie
http://list.eeng.dcu.ie/mailman/listinfo/irl-dean
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.13/632 - Release Date: 16/01/2007
16:36
More information about the CEUD-ICT
mailing list