[Irl-dean] AAA Claim?

[Barry McMullin]

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, brendan spillane wrote:
[...]
> I believe (possibly in error) that it is acceptable to claim AA
> compliance when a website has information on it in .doc .pdf which are
> not replicated in xhtml
>
> when reading the check point 11.1 you reference above I have always
> taken this into account when using technologies available on the web
> such as flash which are part or all of a website but not for .doc or
> .pdf which a website links to.

Hi Brendan -

I don't think I understand quite what distinction you see
between, say, a resource in flash and a resource in .doc in
relation to conformance to 11.1 - can you clarify or elaborate
that at all?

Thanks,

- Barry.