[Irl-dean] WCAG 2.0 vs. WCAG+Samurai

[Joshue O Connor]

Eoin Campbell wrote:
> It has the benefit of being simple and clear, and totally
> focused on HTML for the web.
> 
> To me, the most controversial point is that he suggests
> that practically all WCAG 1.0 Priority 3 checkpoints
> should _not_ be followed.

He is also completely wrong in the advice he gives about use of the 
@summary for table data.

Caveat Emptor

Josh

********************************************************************

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments 
is confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of 
the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify 
the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to 
delete it and any attachments from your system.

NCBI endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated 
by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.  However, 
it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are 
transmitted.  We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent the views of NCBI


********************************************************************